Voting Paradoxes under Proportional Representation: Evidence from Eight Danish Elections

35 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2008

Date Written: 31-12-2007

Abstract

We analyze voter preferences for eight General Elections for the Danish parliament by using survey data to investigate the possible presence of five types of social choice paradoxes that may occur in list systems of proportional representation. Two serious paradoxes fail to manifest themselves, while three others occur with different frequencies. One paradox always occurs, namely for the social ordering of political parties based on pair-wise comparisons to be significantly different from that of the allocation of seats according to a principle of proportional representation. This result challenges the common view that a party that receives more votes than another must be presumed to be the one preferred by a majority.

Keywords: Social choice, voting paradoxes, voting procedures, electoral systems

JEL Classification: D71, D72

Suggested Citation

Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter, Voting Paradoxes under Proportional Representation: Evidence from Eight Danish Elections (31-12-2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1115297 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1115297

Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard (Contact Author)

University of Copenhagen ( email )

Dept. of Political Science
Ă˜ster Farimagsgade 5, P.O.Box 2099
Copenhagen, DK-1014
Denmark
+45 35 32 37 98 (Phone)
+45 35 32 33 99 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.kurrild-klitgaard.net

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
110
Abstract Views
661
rank
318,792
PlumX Metrics