Differences in the U.S. Trends in the Prevalence of Obesity Based on Body Mass Index and Skinfold Thickness
28 Pages Posted: 1 Jun 2009 Last revised: 17 Jan 2014
Date Written: May 2009
Abstract
There are several ways to measure fatness and obesity, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The primary measure for tracking the prevalence of obesity has historically been body mass index (BMI). This paper compares long-run trends in the prevalence of obesity when obesity is defined using skinfold thickness instead of body mass index (BMI), using data from the full series of U.S. National Health Examination Surveys. The results indicate that when one uses skinfold thicknesses rather than BMI to define obesity, the rise in the prevalence of obesity is detectable ten to twenty years earlier. This underscores the importance of examining multiple measures of fatness when monitoring or otherwise studying obesity.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Have Americans Become More Obese?
By David M. Cutler, Edward L. Glaeser, ...
-
Why Have Americans Become More Obese?
By David M. Cutler, Edward L. Glaeser, ...
-
The Economic Reality of the Beauty Myth
By Susan L. Averett and Sanders Korenman
-
An Economic Analysis of Adult Obesity: Results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
By Shin-yi Chou, Michael Grossman, ...
-
The Long-Run Growth in Obesity as a Function of Technological Change
By Tomas Philipson and Richard A. Posner
-
The Long-Run Growth in Obesity as a Function of Technological Change
By Richard A. Posner and Tomas Philipson
-
The Growth of Obesity and Technological Change: A Theoretical and Empirical Examination
-
Body Weight and Women&Apos;S Labor Market Outcomes
By John Cawley
-
Maternal Employment and Overweight Children
By Patricia M. Anderson, Kristin F. Butcher, ...
-
Maternal Employment and Overweight Children
By Kristin F. Butcher, Patricia M. Anderson, ...