South Carolina's Largest Slave Auctioneering Firm

42 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2010 Last revised: 4 Aug 2020

See all articles by Thomas D. Russell

Thomas D. Russell

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Date Written: 1993


This article presents the original finding that South Carolina's legal system conducted a majority of the state's slave auctions during the antebellum years.Courts conducted slave auctions in several circumstances. Sheriffs sold the property of debtors; and courts also conducted or supervised sales in order to divide estates. Drawing upon extensive empirical analysis of primary sources in various South Carolina archives, this article compares the total number of slaves sold at court-ordered or court-supervised sales with the best empirical estimates for private slave sales - whether at auction or not. The conclusion is that the courts acted as the state's greatest slave auctioneering firm.

South Carolina's role with regard to the sales of slaves was no different than other slave jurisdictions, although the article does not present empirical work from other states. The principal role of the state in the auction sales of slaves puts the legal system at the center of the American domestic slave market.

Keywords: Antebellum, Antiracism, Auctions, Black Lives Matter, BLM, Chancery, Empirical, Family Separation, Family, Ideology, Institutional Racism, Legal history, Quantitative, Sheriffs, Slave auctions, Slavery, South Carolina, Systemic Racism, Trial Courts,

Suggested Citation

Russell, Thomas David, South Carolina's Largest Slave Auctioneering Firm (1993). Chicago-Kent L. Rev., Vol. 68, pp. 1241-82, 1993, Available at SSRN:

Thomas David Russell (Contact Author)

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Suite 407D
Denver, CO 80208
United States
303-871-6224 (Phone)


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics