China's Great Ascendancy and Structural Risks: Consequences of Asymmetric Market Liberalisation
21 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2010
Abstract
China's great ascendancy from a poor agrarian economy to an economic superpower is unprecedented. But in the process, structural imbalances, resource inefficiency, and income inequality worsened rapidly. It is argued that the coexistence of China's extraordinary growth and serious structural risks are two sides of the same coin: asymmetric liberalisation of product and factor markets. Distortions in markets for labour, capital, land, energy, and the environment lower production costs, increase corporate profits, raise investment returns, improve the international competitiveness of Chinese goods, and therefore lift China's growth. But they also depress consumption. China needs to accelerate factor market liberalisation in order to complete the transition to a market economy and to lock the economy onto a more sustainable path.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?
Recommended Papers
-
The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience
By Alwyn Young
-
Understanding China's Economic Performance
By Jeffrey D. Sachs and Wing Thye Woo
-
Lessons from the East Asian Nics: A Contrarian View
By Alwyn Young
-
The Asian Miracle and Modern Growth Theory
By Howard Pack and Richard R. Nelson
-
Growth, Economies of Scale, and Targeting in Japan (1955-1990)
By Dick Beason and David E. Weinstein
-
Sources of China's Economic Growth, 1952-1999: Incorporating Human Capital Accumulation
By Yan Wang and Yudong Yao
-
By Zuliu Hu
-
By Zuliu Hu
-
Sources of Economic Growth: An Extensive Growth Accounting Exercise
-
China's Pattern of Growth: Moving to Sustainability and Reducing Inequality
By Louis Kuijs and Tao Wang