Explaining Midterm Loss: The Tandem Effects of Withdrawn Coattails and Balancing

43 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2010

See all articles by Robert S. Erikson

Robert S. Erikson

Columbia University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: August 12, 2010

Abstract

This paper tests coattail and balancing theories of midterm loss in congressional elections. Neither theory can by itself account for the regularity of midterm loss. But together they can. When, following a close presidential election, there are no coattails to withdraw, ideological balancing at midterm generates a loss for the presidential party. When voters can anticipate a presidential landslide allowing them to balance their congressional vote in the presidential year, the winner’s coattails are withdrawn at midterm. Either way, the presidential party loses seats. Testing the variables of each theory while controlling for those of the other, this paper finds strong statistical evidence that both process are at work to insure midterm loss.

Suggested Citation

Erikson, Robert S., Explaining Midterm Loss: The Tandem Effects of Withdrawn Coattails and Balancing (August 12, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1658159 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1658159

Robert S. Erikson (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Department of Political Science ( email )

MC3320
420 West 118th Street
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-0036 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
268
Abstract Views
1,385
rank
148,617
PlumX Metrics