The Legal Impact of Emerging Governance Models on Public Education and Its Office Holders

31 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2012 Last revised: 24 Jun 2013

See all articles by Robert A. Garda

Robert A. Garda

Loyola University of New Orleans College of Law

David Doty

Canyons Schools District

Date Written: December 18, 2012

Abstract

The idea that changing the formal structure of governance can lead to better schools is rooted in American political and intellectual history. Politicians, career educators, parents, business leaders, and investors continue to wrangle over the control of public schools all across the country. With these battles for control have come more lawsuits, more laws, and more administrative regulations dictating the governance structures of educational institutions. Indeed, one could argue that, in recent years, debates over how schools and school districts should be governed have subsumed the curriculum debates over how and what children should be taught. Leadership matters, and therefore stakeholders throughout the education community are experimenting with governance innovations as they attempt to dramatically improve student achievement and patron engagement.

Charter schools are the most ubiquitous example of the transformation, but states and districts are implementing a variety of other governance reforms ranging from the modest to the extreme. At the modest end, many school districts are decentralizing administrative control from the school board to individual schools and granting site-level autonomy over budgeting, personnel, curriculum and instruction. In the middle of the spectrum, the role of the school board itself is changing, with mayoral control over education policy and appointment power on the rise. While some states and communities are innovating through consolidation or division of school districts, others have eliminated local school boards altogether, by wresting control over the operation and management of schools under accountability measures, as seen most recently in Detroit. And at the extreme end, the school systems in New York, Chicago, Denver, Hartford, New Orleans and the District of Columbia have implemented a portfolio strategy, where public schools are run by multiple providers and governed by a myriad of entities. Regardless of the governance model pursued, stakeholders must be aware that a major challenge to the status quo model of traditional public schools operating under the direction of a locally elected school board is likely to come to a neighborhood near them very soon. This Article discusses some of these new education governance models and the emerging legal issues they present.

Keywords: educational governance, mayoral control, portfolio school district, no child left behind act, consolidation, detachment, site level autonomy, voting rights, state constitution, equal protection

JEL Classification: H10, H11, H52, H70, I21, I28

Suggested Citation

Garda, Robert A. and Doty, David, The Legal Impact of Emerging Governance Models on Public Education and Its Office Holders (December 18, 2012). 45 The Urban Lawyer 21 (2013), Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Research Paper No. 2013-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2191159

Robert A. Garda (Contact Author)

Loyola University of New Orleans College of Law ( email )

7214 St. Charles Ave.
Campus Box 901
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States

David Doty

Canyons Schools District ( email )

9150 South 500 West
Sandy, UT 84070
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
548
rank
381,130
PlumX Metrics