El Salvador: Methods Used to Document Human Rights Violations

8 Human Rights Quarterly 731 (1986)

UNM School of Law Research Paper

40 Pages Posted: 20 May 2013


This study describes and analyzes the methods used to document human rights abuses in El Salvador, focusing on the methods used by the United States Government through its Embassy in San Salvador, and by Tutela Legal, a nongovernmental monitoring agency in San Salvador.

The authors examined Tutela and U.S. records which were relevant and available for 1980 through 1984 and used post-1984 official statements which relate to methods. The focus is on the method used for the documentation of the murder or disappearance of civilians.

This paper begins with an examination of the current international human rights standards as they relate to documentation in EI Salvador and the U.S. perspective on the issues. Then the history and methods of data collection on human rights violations, as practiced by Tutela and the U.S. State Department, are discussed. A section follows on factors of reliability and accuracy for data on violations of human rights, data that are often collected under conditions of great hardship and risk. Next, a general picture is drawn of how well the Tutela and U.S. methods take into account reliability and accuracy criteria. Finally, in an Appendix, several possible quantitative indices of human rights violations are discussed.

Suggested Citation

Valencia-Weber, Gloria and Weber, Robert J., El Salvador: Methods Used to Document Human Rights Violations. 8 Human Rights Quarterly 731 (1986), UNM School of Law Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2266671

Gloria Valencia-Weber (Contact Author)

University of New Mexico - School of Law ( email )

1117 Stanford, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87131
United States

Robert J. Weber

Northwestern University - Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences (MEDS) ( email )

2001 Sheridan Road
Evanston, IL 60208
United States

Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics