Stakeholder Conflicts and Cash Flow Shocks: Evidence from Changes in ERISA Pension Funding Rules
54 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2014 Last revised: 8 May 2018
Date Written: April 25, 2017
Abstract
In 2012, Congress passed Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (“MAP-21”), which changed the ERISA pension funding rules such that mandatory pension contributions decreased. Advocates for the bill argued that reducing mandatory contributions would increase firms’ investment. In contrast, I do not find an average increase in investment among the firms benefiting from MAP-21. Rather, I find that firms either hold pension funding relief on their balance sheets as liquid assets or pay out pension funding relief to shareholders. To the extent that managers increase investment in response to MAP-21, it is concentrated in firms with weak governance or ineffective internal controls.
Keywords: MAP-21, pension accounting, ERISA pension funding, investment, payout policy, actuarial manipulation
JEL Classification: M48, G31, G35, J32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Paper statistics
Recommended Papers
-
The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings
By Tim C. Opler, Lee Pinkowitz, ...
-
The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash
By Heitor Almeida, Murillo Campello, ...
-
Why Do U.S. Firms Hold so Much More Cash than They Used to?
By Thomas W. Bates, Kathleen M. Kahle, ...
-
Why Do U.S. Firms Hold so Much More Cash than They Used to?
By Thomas W. Bates, Kathleen M. Kahle, ...
-
Bank Lines of Credit in Corporate Finance: An Empirical Analysis
By Amir Sufi
-
Corporate Governance and Firm Cash Holdings
By Jarrad Harford, Sattar Mansi, ...
-
Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash
By Michael W. Faulkender and Rong Wang
-
Is Cash Negative Debt? A Hedging Perspective on Corporate Financial Policies
By Heitor Almeida, Viral V. Acharya, ...