Fiscal Administration and Public Sector

141 Pages Posted: 29 Mar 2015 Last revised: 6 Sep 2021

See all articles by Kiyoung Kim

Kiyoung Kim

Chosun University - Department of Law

Date Written: March 22, 2015

Abstract

A fiscal administration shows the reality of government and public organization in their provision of public good or service for the citizen. It is an independent subject from the accounting, economic, political, and legal science, which is interdisciplinary and strives for any distinct goal of studies. A fiscal sustainability perhaps would be one ideal that this science would flounder to crystallize and hold out. The studies would be similar to the adjacent sciences, but could be defined ultimately for its unique feature or characteristic. The accounting or accounting sciences would aim to set forth the standards of evaluating the operation and asset or debt as well as the formality to show the numerical status or assessment for the businesses, mainly private and secondarily public. The fiscal administration involves these aspects, but there are many other elements to inculcate the minds of fiscal researcher, such as public ideals or social justice beyond the math or numerical requirements. The economic science would guide the criterion of practice for the government or public organization when they contemplate on the fiscal issues or challenges. The efficiency of budget or basic concepts, i.e., scanty resources or appropriability problem, non-exclusion and non-exhaustion, eminent dichotomy between the private and public sectors or privatization, distinction between provision and production, and so on, would divulge a close dialogue and interactive understanding between the two sciences. Nevertheless, there are differences being present invariably and conceptually between them. For example, the market failure perhaps would be one stigmatic condition to increase the profile of fiscal science. A provision anticipated from the government had been defined far earlier from the classic thought, such as police and national defense. We may share the economic idea, such as Pareto criterion, but the fiscal administration would phase out a multifaceted interplay, principally because it concerns of rule of government and because of its general absoluteness. Many artificial and institutional assumption and terms would variegate the pure theory of Pareto optimal to struggle in the cause of immeasurable kinds of values or concepts. For example, democracy is based on the head count and generally from the value of equal voting in deciding a fiscal issue. The bloated payroll would perhaps presuppose an odd reality deviated from the Pareto ideals, and the logrolling or lobbying would upstage or provide a culprit to breach the economic ways of interaction or commandment. In some cases, they trade a vote to pass the public hurdle that misallocates the resources for less than efficient public programs. Nevertheless, it explains the place where we now stand, and the macro-economy or the kind of thoughts would be considered as most approximated with the quality of fiscal studies. The science of fiscal administration would not disappear unless our reality would be purified, as the economic thought espoused, for the idealistic liberal market or communism. In both cases, the government would no longer be necessary and the fiscal administration is never demanded. It also would be denied if the communist ideals would become a reality any ultimately, say, perish of government and idealistic friendship of working class without exploitation. This means the fiscal administration is a practical science, not merely a theoretical framework, which is to be investigated and approached for the kind of hybrid products. As the political science is basically a bland product on the concept of political power, it could be intermingled with the fiscal science partly in areas of thought, but be made distinct among another.

Keywords: budget, public sector, finance, fiscal federalism, globalization, budget process, role of state, fiscal deficit, fiscal sustainability, public organization, tax source, expenditure profile, CAFR

JEL Classification: H10, H20, H30, H40, H50, H60, H70, K10, M10, L30

Suggested Citation

Kim, Kiyoung, Fiscal Administration and Public Sector (March 22, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2586039 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586039

Kiyoung Kim (Contact Author)

Chosun University - Department of Law ( email )

Korea, Republic of (South Korea)
82-62-230-7694 (Phone)
82-62-227-0295 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.chosun.ac.kr/user/indexMain.do?siteId=lawkim

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
515
Abstract Views
4,617
rank
70,269
PlumX Metrics