Testing Appellate Court Assignments as a Natural Experiment: Gender Induced Panel Effects in Sex-Discrimination Cases

21 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2015

See all articles by Robert S. Erikson

Robert S. Erikson

Columbia University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: July 10, 2015

Abstract

The random assignment of judges in the US Appellate Courts has been underutilized in the study of court panel effects. The present study treats case assignment in the US Appellate Courts as a natural experiment, testing for panel effects of female judges in Title VII sex discrimination cases, comparing the votes of male fellow-panelists when the treatment judge is a female with the votes of fellow-panelists of the control judges who are male and of the same party as the female judge. All comparisons are within the same circuit and within the same two-year time window. The paper finds support for strong panel effects - that female judges influence the votes of male judges to be more liberal on sex discrimination cases.

Suggested Citation

Erikson, Robert S., Testing Appellate Court Assignments as a Natural Experiment: Gender Induced Panel Effects in Sex-Discrimination Cases (July 10, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2629317 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2629317

Robert S. Erikson (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Department of Political Science ( email )

MC3320
420 West 118th Street
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-0036 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
75
Abstract Views
716
rank
403,571
PlumX Metrics