Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact email@example.com.
Global Health Security and Universal Health Coverage: Understanding Convergences and Divergences for a Synergistic Response
23 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2020More...
Background: Global health security (GHS) and universal health coverage (UHC) are key global health agendas which aspire for a healthier and safer world. However, there are tensions between GHS and UHC strategy and implementation. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between GHS and UHC using two recent quantitative indices.
Methods: We conducted a macro-analysis to determine the presence of association between GHS index (GHSI) and UHC index (UHCI). We calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the coefficient of determination. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25 with a 95% level of confidence.
Findings: There is a moderate and significant association between GHSI and UHCI (r=0.662) and individual indices of UHCI (maternal and child health and infectious diseases: r=0.623, 0.594, respectively). However, there is no association between GHSI and the non-communicable diseases (NCDs) index (r=0.063). The risk of GHS threats a significant and negative correlation with the capacity for GHS (r=-0.604) and the capacity for UHC (r=-0.792).
Implications: The aspiration for GHS will not be realized without UHC; hence, the tension between these two global health agendas should be transformed into a synergistic solution. We argue that strengthening the health systems, in tandem with the principles of primary health care, and implementing a “One Health” approach will progressively enable countries to achieve both UHC and GHS towards a healthier and safer world that everyone aspires to live in.
Funding Statement: School of Public Health, the University of Queensland.
Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Keywords: Global Health Security; Public Health Emergencies; International Health Regulations; Universal Health Coverage; Health Systems
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation