Unveiling the Role of Multiple Blockholders: Evidence from Closely Held Firms

26 Pages Posted: 19 May 2020

See all articles by Annalisa Russino

Annalisa Russino

University of Palermo - Department of Statistics and Mathematics

Pasquale Massimo Picone

U. of Palermo

Giovanni Battista Dagnino

University of Rome LUMSA

Date Written: November 2019

Abstract

Research Question/Issue. This paper disentangles how the modes of ownership distribution among multiple blockholders and their heterogeneity shape principal–principal conflicts and, in turn, affect firm performance. The paper offers empirical evidence from a panel of Italian closely held firms over the period 2009–2014. Research Findings/Insights. We explore the principal–principal conflicts among blockholders across two distinct control structures. When a single blockholder controls the firm, principal–principal conflicts are shaped by the trade‐off between the alignment effect and the monitoring effect. In this scenario, we find that the relationship between the two largest blockholders' ownership concentration and firm performance is U‐shaped. Furthermore, we show that heterogeneity across the two largest blockholder types has a negative effect on performance. In the absence of a controlling blockholder, firm control is usually obtained by forming coalitions, and principal–principal conflicts involve the blockholders inside the controlling coalition and the other shareholders. We find that the ownership distribution and heterogeneity across blockholder types are negatively related to the size of controlling coalitions, and in turn, the size of controlling coalitions is positively correlated with firm performance. Theoretical/Academic Implications. We contribute to principal–principal segment of agency theory by showing that the presence of a controlling blockholder is a key variable that alters the relationship between blockholders' ownership concentration and corporate performance, as well as the relationship between heterogeneity across the largest blockholders and firm performance. Practitioner/Policy Implications. Our findings across control structures in which multiple blockholders are present suggest that blockholders take different roles depending on the control structure in which they are involved. The implications of these findings relate to the design of the ownership structure of a firm.

Keywords: Corporate Governance, blockholder type, closely held firms, ownership distribution, principal–principal conflicts

Suggested Citation

Russino, Annalisa and Picone, Pasquale Massimo and Dagnino, Giovanni Battista, Unveiling the Role of Multiple Blockholders: Evidence from Closely Held Firms (November 2019). Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 27, Issue 6, pp. 477-502, 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3593721 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/corg.12299

Annalisa Russino (Contact Author)

University of Palermo - Department of Statistics and Mathematics ( email )

Palazzo Steri Piazza Marina
61 - 90133 Palermo
Italy

Pasquale Massimo Picone

U. of Palermo ( email )

Palermo, 24129
Italy

Giovanni Battista Dagnino

University of Rome LUMSA ( email )

Via Filippo Parlatore, 65
PALERMO, PA 95129
Italy
0916810761 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.lumsa.it/giovanni-battista-dagnino

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
3
Abstract Views
299
PlumX Metrics