How Soon Is Now: Estate of Moore & The Unraveling of Deathbed Estate Planning

26 Pages Posted: 25 Aug 2021

See all articles by Beckett Cantley

Beckett Cantley

Northeastern University

Geoffrey Dietrich

Cantley Dietrich LLC

Date Written: July 23, 2021

Abstract

On April 7, 2020 the U.S. Tax Court ruled in Estate of Moore v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2020-40, that certain deathbed transfers should be includible in the decedent’s estate for United States Federal Estate Tax (“estate tax”) purposes. The court applied Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 2036 to the transfers due to the decedent’s continued interests in the transferred property. The Tax Court stated that I.R.C. § 2036 creates “a general rule that brings back all property that a decedent transfers before he dies, subject to two exceptions.” The first exception is for bona fide sales for full and adequate consideration. The second exception is for “any property that [the decedent] transferred in which he did not keep a right to possession, enjoyment, or rights to the issue of the transferred property.” The Tax Court stated that the first exception depends on the transferor’s motivations, and that the decedent’s actions made it clear there was no bona fide sale. As a result, the Tax Court determined that I.R.C. § 2036(a)(1) applied to the transfer.

Estate of Moore is the latest in a line of cases in which taxpayers made deathbed transfers close to the date of death and the IRS successfully argued that the transferred property is includible in the decedent’s gross estate. In Estate of Bongard v. Commissioner, 124 T.C. 95 (2005), the Tax Court created a three-part test to determine whether I.R.C. § 2036 pulls property back into a decedent’s estate. In Estate of Strangi v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-145, aff’d 417 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2005), the Tax Court provided additional guidance for how the court interprets I.R.C. § 2036(a)(1). In Estate of Nancy H. Powell v. Commissioner, 148 T.C. No. 18 (2017), the court builds on the rationale established by Strangi, but ultimately invokes I.R.C. § 2036(a)(2) to include the transferred assets in decedent’s gross estate. This article: (1) provides an overview of deathbed transfers case law; (2) describes typical such deathbed transfers; (3) outlines the I.R.C. § 2036 statute; (4) discusses the main seminal cases in the area of deathbed transfers, including Estate of Bongard, Estate of Strangi, Estate of Powell, and Estate of Moore; (5) synthesizes the case law on I.R.C. § 2036 and analyzers policy considerations regarding such law; and (6) concludes with a summary of the article’s findings.

Keywords: Taxation, Estate Planning, Estate Tax, Deathbed Transfers

Suggested Citation

Cantley, Beckett and Dietrich, Geoffrey, How Soon Is Now: Estate of Moore & The Unraveling of Deathbed Estate Planning (July 23, 2021). Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3892501

Beckett Cantley (Contact Author)

Northeastern University ( email )

211 Seacrest Beach Blvd W
Rosemary Beach, FL 32461
United States
702-881-4849 (Phone)

Geoffrey Dietrich

Cantley Dietrich LLC ( email )

4514 Cole Ave. | Suite 600
Dallas, TX TX 75205
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.cantleydietrich.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
182
Abstract Views
463
rank
214,399
PlumX Metrics