Distinguishing between Observationally Equivalent Theories of Crises

40 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016

Date Written: November 2002

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to empirically test across alternative, apparently observationally equivalent theories of currency crises. Theories of crises are often difficult to distinguish from each other based on the behavior of commonly used predictors. Using a comprehensive data set on gross external assets and liabilities for 167 countries created by the World Bank's Latin America and the Caribbean Region and the Development Research Group, this study is able to make a significant move toward redressing this shortcoming. It focuses on identifying potential crisis predictors, as well as testing the validity of the distinct transmission mechanisms implied by various theories of currency crisis. Evidence is presented in support of insurance-based models, suggesting that proxies for contingent liability accumulation are effective crisis predictors.

This paper - a product of the Office of the Chief Economist, Latin America and the Caribbean Region - is part of a larger effort in the region to promote a deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of balance-of-payments crises.

Suggested Citation

Shankar, Rashmi, Distinguishing between Observationally Equivalent Theories of Crises (November 2002). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=636288

Rashmi Shankar (Contact Author)

World Bank ( email )

1818 H Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
648
PlumX Metrics