Regional Trade Agreements Versus Broad Liberalization: Which Path Leads to Faster Growth? Time-Series Evidence
34 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2006
Date Written: March 1998
Abstract
Should a closed economy open its trade to all countries or limit itself to participation in regional trade agreements (RTAs)? Based on time-series evidence for a data set for 1950-92, this paper estimates and compares the growth performance of countries that liberalized broadly and those that joined an RTA. The comparisons show that economies grew faster after broad liberalization, both in the short and long run, but slower after participation in an RTA. Economies also had higher investment shares after broad liberalization, but lower ones after joining an RTA. The policy implications support broad liberalization.
Keywords: Economic Growth of Open Economies
JEL Classification: F43
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?
Paper statistics
Recommended Papers
-
Trade Policy and Economic Growth: a Skeptic&Apos;S Guide to Cross-National Evidence
By Francisco Rodriguez and Dani Rodrik
-
Trade Orientation, Distortions and Growth in Developing Countries
-
Openness and Growth: A Time-Series, Cross-Country Analysis for Developing Countries
-
Openness, Outward Orientation, Trade Liberalization and Economic Performance in Developing Countries