What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function?
CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich, Working Paper No. 06/54
41 Pages Posted: 5 Sep 2006
Date Written: August 2006
Abstract
When valuing risky prospects, people typically overweight small probabilities and underweight medium and large probabilities, but there is vast heterogeneity in individual behavior. We explore the relationship between person-specific probability weights, estimated from investment decisions in a laboratory experiment, and personal characteristics. We find considerable interaction effects with gender. While women's probability weighting is strongly and significantly susceptible to mood states, men's is not. Moreover, we show that cheerful and optimistic people weight probabilities of investment gains more favorably than do pessimistic people. People who calculate expected payoffs are less prone to probability distortions than those who do not use a lottery's expected value as a decision criterion. None of the factors studied impact subjects' valuations of monetary outcomes.
Keywords: Probability Weighting Function, Prospect Theory, Risk Aversion, Gender
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Winter Blues: A Sad Stock Market Cycle
By Mark J. Kamstra, Lisa A. Kramer, ...
-
The Halloween Indicator, 'Sell in May and Go Away': Another Puzzle
By Ben Jacobsen and Sven Bouman
-
Losing Sleep at the Market: The Daylight-Savings Anomaly
By Mark J. Kamstra, Lisa A. Kramer, ...
-
Are Investors Moonstruck? - Lunar Phases and Stock Returns
By Lu Zheng, Kathy Yuan, ...
-
Lunar Cycle Effects in Stock Returns
By Ilia D. Dichev and Troy D. Janes
-
Rain or Shine: Where is the Weather Effect?
By Ning Zhu and William N. Goetzmann
-
Rain or Shine: Where is the Weather Effect?
By Ning Zhu and William N. Goetzmann
-
Rain or Shine: Where is the Weather Effect?
By William N. Goetzmann and Ning Zhu
-
By Ben Jacobsen and Wessel Marquering