Was the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Good News for Corporate Bondholders?
64 Pages Posted: 25 Feb 2007 Last revised: 13 Jul 2008
Date Written: March 20, 2008
Abstract
We find a significant decline in average corporate bondholder value around events leading up to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), but only among bonds issued by firms that are expected to experience relatively large governance changes under SOX. Further, we do not find evidence that the market expects bondholders to benefit from some of the positive consequences potentially associated with SOX, such as improved earnings quality, a reduced probability of intentional misreporting, or reduced earnings volatility. Together, these findings are consistent with the bond market expecting the exogenously-imposed changes under SOX to result in corporate governance structures that make bondholders relatively worse off.
JEL Classification: G38, G12, G32, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By Ivy Zhang
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance
-
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: the Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules
-
Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings Management
By Haidan Li, Morton Pincus, ...
-
Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations
By Christian Leuz, Alexander J. Triantis, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Firms' Going-Private Decisions
By Ellen Engel, Rachel M. Hayes, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Security Market Behavior: Early Evidence
By Zabihollah Rezaee and Pankaj K. Jain